David Feinstein, Independent Practice in Psychology, Ashland, Oregon

Physiological Mechanisms of Energy Psychology Treatments: An Updated Synthesis

David Feinstein, Independent Practice in Psychology, Ashland, Oregon

Abstract

Background: Energy psychology encompasses a range of treatments that utilize somatic interventions to promote psychological change by influencing the body’s electromagnetic signaling systems. The most popular and systematically investigated of these modalities is Emotional Freedom Techniques (EFT). The distinctive feature of the approach is the stimulation of acupuncture points (acupoints) by having the client tap on them while simultaneously using words and imagery that evoke clinically relevant memories, emotions, and cognitions. Strong outcomes using the approach have been documented in more than 200 peer-reviewed clinical trials. While tapping on the body to heal emotional trauma or to change longstanding behavioral patterns is an unconventional approach, this growing body of efficacy evidence warrants scrutiny into potential mechanisms of action.

Methods:While speculation about how the procedures involved in energy psychology protocols produce strong outcomes has taken many directions, areas of consensus have been emerging in relation to the physiological mechanisms underlying the approach.This paper synthesizes current literature to identify these probable physiological mechanisms.

Results:Seven empirically supported premises that provide insight into the physiological mechanisms were derived from the peer-reviewed energy psychology literature with supportive material drawn from pertinent publications in psychology, physiology, and neurology:

1. Biological markers demonstrating clinical improvements consistently follow acupoint tapping sessions.
2. Tapping on an acupoint generates electromagnetic signals
3. These signals are transmitted via afferent nerves and connective tissue to the brain.
4. The signals reach brain regions that are activated by the words, thoughts, memories, and images paired with the tapping.
5. The signals upregulate or downregulate clinically relevant brain regions, promoting homeostasis, balance, and adaptive behavior.
6. This process aligns with the mechanisms of memory reconsolidation, explaining durable cognitive and behavioral shifts.
7. Tapping on acupuncture points during imaginal exposure makes imaginal exposure more effective.

Conclusion: While further research is needed, the existing literature offers plausible physiological explanations for the documented positive mental health outcomes following the application of acupoint tapping protocols.

Keywords: energy psychology, Emotional Freedom Techniques, acupoints, neural mechanisms, mechanosensory transduction, reconsolidation

Public Impact Statement

This paper sheds light on the physiological mechanisms underlying energy psychology, an approach that has demonstrated the ability to produce rapid clinical improvements in treating a range of mental health conditions. As efficacy research continues to accumulate, understanding review not only enhances scientific understanding of energy psychology but also facilitates its integration into mainstream therapeutic practices, potentially leading to more effective mental health interventions and improved outcomes for those
affected by psychological distress.

As research establishing efficacy, durability, and unusual speed in the treatment of mental health conditions using protocols that stimulate acupuncture points through tapping has become substantial (Church et al., 2022; Feinstein, 2023; Stapleton et al., 2023), the question of how the procedure works is increasingly relevant. The claim that tapping on specified points of the skin while using words and imagery that evoke memories, emotions, and cognitions—the distinctive procedure of energy psychology and its most popular and well-researched modality, Emotional Freedom Techniques (EFT)—challenges conventional understanding. In fact, the seemingly odd procedures and apparent lack of plausible mechanisms has resulted in highly skeptical assessments of the approach over more than two decades (e.g., Bakker, 2013; Boness et al., 2024; Guadiano et al., 2012; McCaslin, 2009; McNally, 2001; Pignotti & Thyer, 2009), some going so far
as to characterize the use of the approach by psychotherapists as unethical (Boness et al., 2024).

Nonetheless, more than 200 clinical trials showing statistically significant improvement after energy psychology treatments in at least one targeted symptom, often with unusual speed, are listed in a database maintained by the nonprofit Association for Comprehensive Energy Psychology (ACEP; energypsych.org, retrieved December 22, 2024). The database also lists some 200 additional peer-reviewed laboratory studies, theoretical papers, commentary, and other forms of evidence, including meta-analyses reporting strong effect sizes and head-to-head comparisons demonstrating equivalent or superior outcomes in relationship to established evidence-based treatments, including the “gold standard,” cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT)

Early papers favorable to energy psychology often attributed its mechanism of action to concepts such as “meridians” and “subtle energies.” This reliance on traditional Eastern medicine constructs, which are difficult to verify using conventional scientific methods, led to severe criticism. Skeptics began labeling energy psychology as a “pseudoscience” due in large part to its use of these constructs, which were considered unverifiable, hindering the method’s acceptance by professional organizations and the academic community. However, as the field has matured, so has understanding of the underlying mechanisms of the approach and its effectiveness.

Recent research has begun to reveal the neurobiological and psychological processes leading to its therapeutic actions, shedding light on how stimulating acupoints while focusing on emotional content can produce rapid and significant clinical improvements. This paper synthesizes the most current formulations derived from the literature as found in the ACEP database and corroborated by other scientific studies, presenting seven empirically supported premises that contribute to understanding the mechanisms underlying the approach’s efficacy. This synthesis also builds upon a progressive series of papers by the current author tracking these developments (Feinstein,2008, 2012, 2015, 2019, 2021, 2023).

Empirically Supported Premises Regarding the Mechanisms of Energy Psychology

The following premises about energy psy chology’s procedures and mechanisms of action focus on: (a) biological changes associated with acupoint tapping; (b) electromagnetic signals generated when an acupoint is stimulated; (c) the pathways along which these signals are transmit ted; (d) the movement of these signals toward clinically relevant brain regions; (e) the clinically beneficial effects of these signals on those brain regions; and (f) the reasons for the durability of these effects. A final premise describes the neuro logical processes that explain why imaginal expo sure combined with acupoint tapping appears to be more effective than imaginal exposure alone.

1. Biological Markers Demonstrating Clinical Improvements Consistently Follow Acupoint Tapping Sessions

Biological markers complement clinical observations and client subjective reports, pro viding objective, quantifiable measures of physi ological processes related to clinical interven tions and their impact on mental health conditions (Engel et al., 2022). For instance, psychological trauma can lead to hyperarousal in the limbic sys tem, which can be objectively measured (e.g., corti sol levels, blood pressure, heart rate, EEG readings) and is associated with subjective experiences such as increased irritability, difficulty concentrating, sleep disturbances, hypervigilance, and exaggerated startle responses (Sherin & Nemeroff, 2011). Among the statistically significant, clinically beneficial changes in biological markers that have been found following acupoint tapping sessions are reductions of the stress hormone cortisol while focusing on personal concerns (Church et al., 2012; Stapleton et al., 2020); lowered blood pres sure (Bach et al., 2019); favorable expression of genes that influence emotional regulation, learn ing, neuroplasticity, and synaptic connectivity (Church et al., 2018; Maharaj, 2016); the regu lation of microRNA associated with depression (Yount et al., 2019), improved heart rate vari ability, which is a measure of cardiac flexibility in response to autonomic distress (Morikawa et al., 2021); and increased lymphocyte produc tion (Babamahmoodi et al., 2015).

Biological markers do not, however, show what is occurring “under the hood.” They do not reveal the direct mechanisms by which acupoint tapping leads to clinical improvement. They are, rather, secondary mechanisms. Once these well documented physiological changes have been activated by acupoint tapping, the cause-effect dynamics for psychological and other health related outcomes become evident: lowered corti sol levels reduce stress; the expression of genes involved in the modulation of emotions decreases susceptibility to anxiety; increased lymphocyte production improves immunity, etc. In contrast, the following five premises do examine the mech anisms directly underlying the well-documented psychological improvements. Each premise addresses one phase in a sequence of physiologi cal events following acupoint tapping in a psycho therapeutic context.

2. Tapping on an Acupoint Generates Electromagnetic Signals

Acupoints exhibit higher electrical conductiv ity compared to adjacent tissue (Ahn et al., 2008; Li et al., 2012) and possess a greater density of mechanosensory cells (Yao et al., 2014). The capacity of a mechanosensory cell to convert mechanical force into an electrical signal is called “mecha nosensory transduction” (Bagriantsev et al., 2014; Marshall & Lumpkin, 2012). This conversion of pressure into electricity occurs when specialized proteins form pores in the cell membrane that can open or close in response to mechanical stress. When opened by pressure, such as during tapping, they allow ions to flow through, generat ing an electrical signal. As the signal is transmit ted to other areas of the body, it generates and is surrounded by a magnetic field. Mechanosensory transduction is an established biological mecha nism involved in hearing, touch, balance, and osmotic regulation (Marshall & Lumpkin, 2012). Understanding how mechanosensory transduction produces these electromagnetic signals is crucial for comprehending how tapping on acupoints can affect emotional, cognitive, and behavioral processes.

Although the principle that applying pressure to an acupuncture point generates electromagnetic signals through mechanosensory transduction is rooted in biology, psychologists have uti
lized this construct, studying the relationship of mechanosensory transduction to mental health and other psychological processes. For instance, Harrison et al. (2019) noted that “the transduction of mechanical forces into neural signals . . . may contribute to the formation of the psychological concept of self” (Mechanosensation in Health section, para. 1).

3. The Signals Generated by Tapping on Acupuncture Points Are Transmitted Via Afferent Nerves and Connective Tissue to the Brain

The transmission of electromagnetic signals from a stimulated acupoint to the brain again involves well-documented physiological pro cesses. Electromagnetic signals are carried and read by the nervous system (Delmas et al., 2011; Rocha et al., 2022) and can be quickly propa gated from peripheral tissues (e.g., the spinal cord, endocrine glands, heart, stomach, or, in the case of acupoint tapping, the skin) to the brain (Geiger & Jonas, 2000).

Along with the ability of the nervous system to transport electrochemical signals, researchers at Harvard Medical School, using ultrasound imaging, postulated that long-distance signals can be transported through the body’s connective tissue (Langevin & Yandow, 2002), a formulation that has been supported in subsequent studies (Bai et al., 2011; Stecco et al., 2011). The connective tissue contains high concentrations of the semi conductor collagen. Collagen fibers surround acupoints and have been shown to be the first receptors of mechanical force during acupoint stimulation (Wang et al., 2017). The connective tissue supports a potentially faster signaling mechanism than the neuron-to-synapse-to-neuron transmission of the nervous system.

4. The Signals Generated by Acupoint Tapping Reach Brain Regions That Are Activated by the Words, Thoughts, Memories, and Images Paired with the Tapping

When a brain region is activated, a cascading series of physiological changes occur, including shifts in blood flow, oxygenation, metabolism, electromagnetic activity, and the release of neurotransmitters (Logothetis, 2008). With a fear inducing memory, image, or anticipation, for instance, electromagnetic signals that modulate emotional responses travel through established pathways such as the amygdala-hippocampus prefrontal cortex circuit (Shin & Liberzon, 2010).

In energy psychology sessions, the thoughts the client brings to mind rouse related brain regions prior to the acupoint stimulation, and the signals generated by the tapping then propagate to those aroused regions. Imaging studies (Di Rienzo et al., 2020; König et al., 2019; Stapleton et al., 2019, Stapleton et al., 2022; Wittfoth et al., 2020) illustrate that the tapping signals reach the brain areas activated by the thoughts held during the tapping. These studies are discussed in the follow ing section as they also show what occurs when the signals reach their target.

5. The Signals Generated by Acupoint Tapping Upregulate or Downregulate Clinically Relevant Brain Regions, Promoting Homeostasis, Balance, and Adaptive Behaviors

Neuroplasticity allows successful psycho therapy to alter neural pathways and activity patterns, leading to upregulation of underactive brain regions associated with symptoms and downregulation of hyperaroused areas. For example, cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for depression and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) has been found to reduce hyperactivity in the amygdala, suggesting that CBT normalizes brain activity in regions implicated in these disorders (Shou et al., 2017).

A decade-long research initiative at Harvard Medical School exploring the neurological effects of acupuncture yielded neuroimaging insights into how stimulating specific acupoints may induce neurological changes (Hui et al., 2005). Prominent decreases of fMRI (functional magnetic resonance imaging) signals were found in the amygdala, hippocampus, and other areas of the limbic system along with signal increases in the somatosensory cortex during the needling of acupuncture points. Since those early investigations of acupuncture, five imaging studies of acupoint stimulation that did not use needles and were more aligned with energy psychology protocols are briefly described:

• Pre/post-treatment fMRI was administered to 24 adults who participated in a six-week acupoint tapping online group focusing on chronic pain (Stapleton et al., 2022). The fMRI analysis showed significantly decreased connectivity between the medial prefrontal cortex (a pain modulating area) and bilateral grey matter areas in the pos terior cingulate cortex and thalamus, both areas also being related to modulating and catastrophizing of pain. These changes in the activity of pain-related brain regions corresponded with participant reports of decreased pain.


• Pre/post-treatment fMRI was administered to 24 adults who participated in a six-week acupoint tapping online group focusing on chronic pain (Stapleton et al., 2022). The fMRI analysis showed significantly decreased connectivity between the medial prefrontal cortex (a pain modulating area) and bilateral grey matter areas in the pos terior cingulate cortex and thalamus, both areas also being related to modulating and catastrophizing of pain. These changes in the activity of pain-related brain regions corresponded with participant reports of decreased pain.


• In an earlier fMRI study, the same prin cipal investigator worked with 15 obese adults (Stapleton et al., 2019). Blood flow to brain regions involved with food craving (the superior temporal gyrus, associated with cognition, and the lat eral orbito-frontal cortex, associated with reward) was significantly reduced when images of desired foods were presented after a series of acupoint tapping sessions, as contrasted with pre-treatment viewing of the same images. Reductions in activity in these brain regions corresponded with decreased cravings.


• A third fMRI investigation examined the neural responses of 17 healthy participants who engaged in a visualized approach to acupoint stimulation while being exposed to images designed to elicit fear and disgust (Wittfoth et al., 2020). Fear-inducing images activated the middle temporal gyrus and posterior middle cingulate cortex, regions that are associated with emotional processing and cognitive functions. The acupoint stimulation produced selective modulation in these brain regions. This corresponded with a diminished subjective intensity in participants’ reactions to the disturbing stimuli. The alterations in neural activation patterns were interpreted as facilitating an integration of negative emotional material.
  
Electroencephalography (EEG) was used to investigate neural changes following an acupoint tapping session with nine subjects presenting with anxiety disorder (König et al., 2019). A single session brought about reductions in activity in the left centro-parietal region, typically associated with emotional processing, and which corresponded with reductions in fear.

• In a study of the successful treatment of a flight phobia using acupoint tapping, mag netoencephalography (MEG) showed, as would be expected after a successful treat ment, that the neural correlates of the threat response were downregulated (Di Rienzo et al., 2020). Meanwhile, activation of frontal executive regions that play a role in cognitive appraisal and the mediation of limbic responses to stressful stimuli was also found.



These preliminary studies examined a variety of conditions. What they have in common is that each provides evidence that (a) the signals generated by acupoint tapping appear to regulate brain regions activated by the thoughts or images brought to mind during the tapping, and (b) their effect is to increase or decrease activity in those regions in ways that correspond with clinical improvement. The precise mechanisms for how this occurs needs further investigation, but the beneficial neurological shifts are consist ent through the five studies found in the ACEP database that used standardized imaging devices to explore neurological shifts following acupoint tapping sessions.




6. The Process Aligns with the Mechanisms of Memory Reconsolidation, Explaining Durable Cognitive and Behavioral Shifts




As every therapist is well aware, deep emotional learnings, often tracing to physical or psychological threat or trauma, are not easily altered (LeDoux & Brown, 2017). The process by which entrenched mental schemas can change has been investigated for more than 50 years through the lens of “memory reconsolidation” (Nader, 2015). When a consolidated memory has been retrieved, it enters a transient state of lability where it can be updated or replaced before being restabilized (reconsolidated). Cellular, molecular, and brain circuit correlates of reconsolidation have been identified, and the theory is generally accepted, although details are still being contested (Lee et al., 2017). The essential concept is that during a “reconsolidation window,” while the memory is labile, a new experience that vividly and deci sively contradicts an old schema can result in the old schema being altered or replaced (Ecker, 2018).




Called a “prediction error” (Exton McGuinness et al., 2015), this mismatch can lead to a major revision, with the new or updated schema then being reconsolidated into the limbic and neocortical circuits that retain mental schemas and biographical memory (resulting in a “new normal”). Clinical reports and implications drawn from research findings suggest that energy psychology protocols are unusually rapid in generating and resolving prediction errors. This is because the tapping transmits signals to the pertinent brain areas that quickly change activation in those areas (e.g., König et al., 2019; Wittfoth et al., 2020). For instance, a man who is consistently angry with his wife brings that anger to mind and taps on acupoints that send signals to his limbic system, resulting in a reduction of anger. Within minutes, the man is able to talk about his wife without feel ing angry or holding the judgments associated with that anger. This discrepancy between his new experience and his expectations constitutes a “prediction error,” leading to an updated mental schema about his wife that is then reconsolidated, becoming the most recent and, consequently, the most salient representation in his memory.




Reconsolidation, whether or not it is recognized, has been posited as a decisive mechanism in most successful psychotherapy outcomes (Ecker, 2018). Because acupoint tapping has been shown to rapidly change activation in pertinent brain areas, it is particularly effective in creating the prediction errors that lead to revised mental schemas. Tapping downregulates autonomic activation and catalyzes a relaxation response. The discrepancy between the client’s anticipated upset and the tapping-induced, downregulated relaxation state creates an internal prediction error without requir ing reframing or presenting an alternative belief or schema. The unexpected relaxation or peaceful ness despite a previously distressing circumstance constitutes the alternative schema.




In summary, the key to memory reconsolidation lies in creating a vivid mismatch between the “old” expected experience and a new, contradictory experience. Generating these prediction errors (with the unpredicted outcome being a more favorable experience) leads to more affirmative mental schemas at both subjective and neurologi cal levels. Energy psychology protocols consistently achieve rapid deactivation of limbic system arousal while a triggering memory or thought is engaged, making them particularly effective at producing and immediately resolving such predic tion errors. This role of reconsolidation in energy psychology treatments is described in greater detail in Feinstein (2021).




7. Tapping on Acupuncture Points During Imaginal Exposure Makes Imaginal Exposure More Effective




Imaginal exposure (whether using memories, imagery, or anticipation) is among the most widely utilized and reliably effective interventions for treating PTSD and other anxiety-based disorders (Racz et al., 2024). Critics of energy psychology have, in fact, attributed any benefits produced by acupoint tapping protocols to their use of imaginal exposure and cognitive restructuring techniques (as well as “common factors” such as empathy, shared goals, therapeutic alliance, and client expectations), rather than to any therapeutic action resulting from the stimulation of acupoints. Proponents of energy psychology, on the other hand, suggest that by combining exposure techniques with acupoint tapping, reductions in anxiety occur more rapidly. This is an extraordinary claim with potentially far-reaching implications for clinical psychology.




Differences in the two approaches to expo sure treatment are relatively straightforward. Conventional exposure methods rely on repetition, in which the anxiety response decreases over time through habituation and reciprocal inhibition. The client learns that the feared response does not occur despite repeatedly bringing the trigger to mind. In energy psychology protocols, imaginal exposure is paired with acupoint tapping, which sends signals directly to the limbic system, result ing in each repetition having greater impact than exposure would alone. This may explain why cli nicians trained in both CBT and acupoint tapping are finding that exposure with tapping is more rapid and durable than exposure without tapping (e.g., Seidi et al., 2021).




Several head-to-head comparisons of CBT vs. tapping treatments, while not isolating the differing exposure approaches, have shown that both therapies lead to strong outcomes, but that the acupoint tapping protocols are significantly faster (e.g., Gaesser & Karan, 2017; Irgens et al., 2017; Jasubhai & Mukundan, 1998). For instance, a study comparing CBT and EFT provided adolescents who scored in the moderate to high range for anxiety with three treatment sessions (Gaesser & Karan, 2017). Each of three groups (CBT, EFT, and a no-treatment control) included 21 subjects. Both CBT and EFT reduced anxiety levels, but the change did not reach statistical significance for the CBT group over the brief course of treatment while it did for the EFT group.




In a study comparing CBT and Thought Field Therapy (TFT, the first acupoint tapping format used by psychologists), 72 patients diagnosed with agoraphobia were randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups or a waitlist (Irgens et al., 2017). Both treatments brought about highly significant symptom reduction, but TFT accomplished these outcomes in five sessions of 50 to 55 minutes each (per the TFT manual used) whereas the CBT group received 12 sessions of 50 to 55 minutes each (per the CBT manual used). While tests were not administered after five CBT sessions to make a fair comparison, the differences in the treatment manuals suggest that more rapid outcomes have been found in using TFT to treat phobias.




In addition to being an ostensibly faster form of imaginal exposure, early studies also show that the benefits of exposure with acupoint tapping are more durable than those of conventional exposure. In two other studies comparing CBT and EFT (Chatwin et al., 2016; Stapleton et al., 2016), both CBT and EFT produced equivalent reductions in depression and anxiety, but the outcomes were not retained on follow-up for the CBT groups. For the EFT groups, the outcomes actually improved on follow-up, which the investigators described as a “delayed effect,” speculating that it involved a greater consolidation of skills and techniques over time.




Conventional forms of exposure are vulnerable to recurrence because the extinction brought about by repeated exposure suppresses old associations while creating new ones. These new associations compete with the original fear association, rather than eliminating it (initially described by Foa & McNally, 1996). The persistence of the original fear association makes it more vulnerable to recurrence.




An alternative method for extinction treat ment has, however, also been developed, first discovered with drug-induced interventions, then through non-drug experiments with animals, and finally for use with humans (Schiller et al., 2010). In these methods, new experiences are induced that completely eliminate (“depotentiate”) old fear learnings at the neurological level, rather than overriding them. Studied in the LeDoux Lab at New York University, one of the investigators observed that by eradicating rather than overriding old associations, the new approaches to expo sure “engage different mechanisms in the lateral amygdala and lead to drastically different behavior outcomes” (Monfils et al., 2009, p. 953). These clinical interventions not only facilitate immediate symptom relief but also lead to more durable outcomes by depotentiating the neural circuits associated with the original fear rather than suppressing them. Because of the facility of acupoint tapping protocols to produce and resolve prediction errors, as discussed previously, the approach falls within this treatment category. For further exploration of the ways acupoint tap ping can increase the effectiveness of conventional exposure approaches, see Lane (2009) and Feinstein (2022).




Discussion and Limitations




While each of these premises has empirical support and they, as a group, provide a plausible explanation of the mechanisms involved when acupoint tapping protocols lead to clinical improvement, they are neither complete nor definitive. As with all treatment approaches, the field of energy psychology continues to evolve as new evidence emerges. The lack of a decisive neurobiological understanding extends to widely accepted treatments, from cognitive behavioral therapy to antidepressant medications. Despite their demonstrated efficacy, the exact neuro biological processes by which these interventions produce their therapeutic effects are not fully understood. For instance, Cuijpers et al. (2019) conducted a systematic review of psycho therapy for depression and concluded that “the mechanisms of change in psychotherapies for depression are still largely unknown” (p. 1). The mechanisms underlying acupoint tapping protocols proposed here represent an attempt at a best understanding based on available studies, but they will, of course, be subject to refinement as further research is conducted.




Confidence in each of the seven premises presented in this paper will, to the extent the constructs on which they are built have been correctly formulated, be strengthened by additional research. Some of the processes described—such as mechanosensory transduction, the propagation of electromagnetic signals from peripheral tissue to the brain, and the role of memory reconsolidation—are supported by studies independent of energy psychology. Direct investigation of energy psychology protocols using imaging equipment, however, does support the premise that the signals produced by acupoint tapping can upregulate or downregulate brain regions aroused by the words and imagery that accompany the tapping, high lighting a key dynamic that holds considerable explanatory value.




As future studies examine other processes, such as mechanosensory transduction, within the context of energy psychology treatments, they will provide important details, nuance, and context. Additional limitations in the data available for this synthesis have been the small sample sizes in some of the imaging studies cited and the fact that the majority of studies on energy psychology have focused on its clinical efficacy rather than its underlying mechanisms.




A limitation common to attempts to identify the mechanisms of action in any psychotherapy is the difficulty of distinguishing the specific mechanisms of a given approach from placebo effects, expectancy, and other nonspecific factors that are inherent to most psychotherapeutic interventions. Helping to address these challenges, the ACEP database (energypsych.org; retrieved December 22, 2024) lists 99 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) focused on energy psychology, six meta analyses examining groupings of these RCTs, and six dismantling studies of energy psychology protocols. Even with this extensive body of research, however, isolating the unique mechanisms specific to energy psychology from placebo effects and other nonspecific variables remains a complex task.




Despite these limitations, the growing body of research supporting the efficacy of energy psychol ogy treatments and the mechanisms synthesized from the literature in this paper offer a plausible framework for understanding the neurological and other physiological processes by which acupoint tapping protocols produce therapeutic effects. This emerging understanding provides a plausible scientific framework for explaining the observed clinical outcomes and a foundation for further research into the precise mechanisms underlying energy psychology interventions. Nonetheless, the complexity of the human nervous system and the multifaceted nature of psychological interventions make it challenging to isolate the specific effects of acupoint tapping from other therapeutic ele ments. To address these challenges, future studies could aim to:





1. Measure the electromagnetic signals gen erated by acupoint tapping directly and track their propagation through the body.


2. Investigate the specific effects of acupoint tapping on brain activity in real-time dur ing treatment sessions.


3. Examine the interaction between acupoint stimulation and memory reconsolidation.


4. Explore the differential effects of tapping on various acupoints to determine if specific points produce unique neurobiologi cal impacts.


5. Conduct longitudinal studies to assess the long-term neuroplastic changes associated with repeated use of energy psychology techniques.





By focusing on these areas, researchers can further refine understanding of the physiological mechanisms that underlie the clinical effective ness of energy psychology interventions.




Conclusion




As research continues to validate the efficacy of energy psychology, understanding how its unusual procedures work becomes a question of broader interest. Seven key evidence supported premises, drawn from physiology, neurology, psychology, and energy psychology’s peer-reviewed literature, reveal that the mechanisms underlying acupoint tapping protocols involve complex interplays among physiological processes and psychological outcomes. This synthesis highlights a sequence of mechanisms, from the generation of electromagnetic signals at acupoints to their transmission via afferent nerves and connective tissue to specific brain regions associated with emotional processing. These essential actions not only clarify how tapping can lead to rapid clinical improvements but also provide a framework that will be useful to practitioners as they refine the procedures that comprise energy psychology protocols.




While significant progress has been made in elucidating the essential mechanisms of action in acupoint tapping protocols, further exploration is necessary to grasp fully these complex interactions. At this point, existing understand ing of the physiological mechanisms that facilitate the strong demonstrated psychological benefits of energy psychology treatments already shows that—despite skepticism about earlier formulations—current explanations align well with the field of psychology and broader scientific understanding.





References

Bagriantsev, S. N., Gracheva, E. O., & Gallagher, P. G. (2014). Piezo proteins: Regulators of mechanosensation and other cellular processes. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 289(46), 31673–31681. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.R114.612697

Bai, Y., Wang, J., Wu, J.-P., Dai, J.-X., Sha, O., Tai, W. Y. D., Yuan, L., & Qiu, N. (2011). Review of evidence suggesting that the fascia network could be the anatomical basis for acupoints and meridians in the human body. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 2011, Article 260510. https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/260510

Bakker, G. (2013). The current status of energy psychology: Extraordinary claims with less than ordinary evidence. Clinical Psychologist, 17(3), 91–99. https://doi.org/10.1111/ cp.12020

Boness, C. L., Pfund, R. A., & Tolin, D. F. (2024). Acupres- sure in psychotherapy as an unsinkable rubber duck: A reply to Feinstein (2023). Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 34(2), 190–199. https://doi.org/10.1037/int0000315 Chatwin, H., Stapleton, P., Porter, B., Devine, S., & Sheldon, T. (2016). The effectiveness of cognitive behavioral therapy and Emotional Freedom Techniques in reducing depression and anxiety among adults: A pilot study. Integrative Medicine, 15(2), 27–34.

Church, D., Stapleton, P., Vasudevan, A., & O’Keefe, T. (2022). Clinical EFT as an evidence-based practice for the treatment of psychological and physiological conditions. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 951451. https://doi.org/10.3389/ fpsyg.2022.951451

Church, D., Yount, G., & Brooks, A. J. (2012). The effect of Emotional Freedom Techniques (EFT) on stress biochemis- try: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 200(10), 891–896. https://doi.org/10.1097/NMD.0b013e31826b9fc1

Church, D., Yount, G., Rachlin, K., Fox, L., & Nelms, J. (2018). Epigenetic effects of PTSD remediation in veterans using Clinical Emotional Freedom Techniques: A randomized controlled pilot study. American Journal of Health Promotion, 32(1), 112–122. https://doi.org/10.1177/0890117116661154

Cuijpers, P., Reijnders, M., & Huibers, M. J. H. (2019). The role of common factors in psychotherapy outcomes. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 15, 207–231.

Delmas, P., Hao, J., & Rodat-Despoix, L. (2011). Molecular mechanisms of mechanotransduction in mammalian sensory neurons. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 12(3), 139–153. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2993

Di Rienzo, F., Saruco, E., Church, D., Daligault, S., Delpuech, C., Gurret, J., Debarnot, U., & Guillot, A. (2020). Neuropsychological correlates of an energy psychology intervention on flight phobia: A MEG single-case study. PsyArXiv Preprints. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/s3hce

Ecker, B. (2018). Clinical translation of memory reconsolidation research: Therapeutic methodology for transformational change by erasing implicit emotional learnings driving symptom production. International Journal of Neuropsychotherapy, 6(1), 1–92. https://doi.org/10.12744/ ijnpt.2018.0001-0092

Engel, S., Klusmann, H., Laufer, S., Kapp, C., Schumacher, S., & Knaevelsrud, C. (2022). Biological markers in clinical psychological research – A systematic framework applied to HPA axis regulation in PTSD. Comprehensive Psychoneuroendocrinology, 11, 100148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpnec.2022.100148

Exton-McGuinness, M. T., Lee, J. L., & Reichelt, A. C. (2015). Updating memories: The role of prediction errors in memory reconsolidation. Behavioural Brain Research, 278, 375–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2014.10.011

Feinstein, D. (2008). Energy psychology: A review of the pre- liminary evidence. Psychotherapy: Research, Theory, Prac- tice, Training, 45(2), 199–213. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-3204.45.2.199

Feinstein, D. (2012). Acupoint stimulation in treating psy- chological disorders: Evidence of efficacy. Review of Gen- eral Psychology, 16(4), 364–380. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028602

Feinstein, D. (2015). How energy psychology changes deep emotional learnings. Neuropsychologist, 10, 38–49.

Feinstein, D. (2019). Energy psychology: Efficacy, speed, mech- anisms. Explore: The Journal of Science and Healing, 15(5), 340–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.explore.2018.11.003

Feinstein, D. (2021). Six empirically supported premises about energy psychology: Mounting evidence for a controversial therapy. Advances in Mind-Body Medicine, 35(2), 17–32.

Feinstein, D. (2022). Uses of energy psychology following catastrophic events. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 856209. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.856209

Feinstein, D. (2023). Integrating the manual stimulation of acupuncture points into psychotherapy: A systematic review with clinical recommendations. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 33(1), 47–67. https://doi.org/10.1037/int0000283

Foa, E. B., & McNally, R. J. (1996). Mechanisms of change in exposure therapy. In R. M. Rapee (Ed.), Current controversies in the anxiety disorders (pp. 329–343). Guilford.

Gaesser, A. H., & Karan, O. C. (2017). A randomized controlled comparison of Emotional Freedom Technique and Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy to reduce adolescent anxiety: A pilot study. Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, 23(2), 102–108. https://doi.org/10.1089/acm.2015.0316

Gaudiano, B. A., Brown, L. A., & Miller, I. W. (2012). Tapping their patients’ problems away?: Characteristics of psychotherapists using energy meridian techniques. Research on Social Work Practice, 22(6), 647–655.

Geiger, J. R., & Jonas, P. (2000). Dynamic control of presynaptic Ca2+ inflow by fast-inactivating K+ channels in hippocampal mossy fiber boutons. Neuron, 28(3), 927–939.

Harrison, L. A., Kats, A., Williams, M. E., & Aziz-Zadeh, L. (2019). The importance of sensory processing in mental health: A proposed addition to the research domain criteria (RDoC) and suggestions for RDoC 2.0. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 103. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00103

Hui, K. K. S., Liu, J., Burch, F. S., & Napadow, V. (2005). Acupuncture modulates the limbic system and the subcortical gray structures of the human brain: Evidence from fMRI studies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(8), 4966–4971. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-0193(2000)9:1<13::aid-hbm2>3.0.co;2-f

Irgens, A. C., Hoffart, A., Nysæter, T. E., Haaland, V. Ø., Borge, F. M., Pripp, A. H., Martinsen, E. W., & Dammen, T. (2017). Thought field therapy compared to cognitive behavioral therapy and wait-list for agoraphobia: A randomized, controlled study with a 12-month follow-up. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1027. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01027

Jasubhai, S., & Mukundan, C. R. (1998). Cognitive Behavioural Therapy and Emotional Freedom Technique in reduc- ing anxiety and depression in Indian adults. International Journal of Emergency Mental Health and Human Resilience, 20(2), 403. https://doi.org/10.4172/1522-4821.1000403

König, N., Stever, S., Seebacher, J., Von Prittwitz, Q., Bliem, H., & Rossi, S. (2019). How therapeutic tapping can alter neural correlates of emotional prosody processing in anxiety. Brain Science, 9(8), 206. https://doi.org/10.3390/ brainsci9080206

Lane, J. R. (2009). The neurochemistry of counterconditioning: Acupressure desensitization in psychotherapy. Energy Psychology: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 1(1), 31–44. https://doi.org/10.9769/EPJ.2009.1.1.JRL

Langevin, H. M., & Yandow, J. A. (2002). Relationship of acupuncture points and meridians to connective tissue planes. Anatomical Record, 269(6), 257–265. https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.10185

Ledoux, J. E., & Brown, R. (2017). A higher-order theory of emotional consciousness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(10), E2016–E2025. https://doi. org/10.1073/pnas.1619316114

Lee, J. L. C., Nader, K., & Schiller, D. (2017). An update on memory reconsolidation updating. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21(7), 531–545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2017.04.006

Li, J., Wang, Q., Liang, H., Dong, H., Li, Y., Ng, E. H., & Wu, X. (2012). Biophysical characteristics of meridians and acupoints: A systematic review. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 2012, Article 793841. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/793841

Logothetis, N. K. (2008). What we can do and what we can- not do with fMRI. Nature, 453(7197), 869–878. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06976

Maharaj, M. E. (2016). Differential gene expression after Emotional Freedom Techniques (EFT) treatment: A novel pilot protocol for salivary mRNA assessment. Energy Psychology: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 8(1), 17–32. https://doi.org/10.9769/EPJ.2016.8.1.MM

Marshall, K. L., & Lumpkin, E. A. (2012). The molecular basis of mechanosensory transduction. Advances in Experi- mental Medicine and Biology, 739, 142–155. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1704-0_9

McCaslin, D. L. (2009). A review of efficacy claims in energy psychology. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 46(2), 249–256.

McNally, R. J. (2001). Tertullian’s motto and Callahan’s method. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 57(10), 1171–1174.

Monfils, M. H., Cowansage, K. K., Klann, E., & LeDoux, J. E.(2009). Extinction-reconsolidation boundaries: Key to persistent attenuation of fear memories. Science, 324, 951–955. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1167975

Morikawa, A., Takayama, M., & Yoshizawa, E. (2021). The efficacy of Thought Field Therapy and its impact on heart rate variability in student counseling: A randomized controlled trial. Explore: The Journal of Science and Healing, 18(5), 579–586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.explore.2021.09.005

Nader, K. (2015). Reconsolidation and the dynamic nature of memory. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology, 7(10), a021782. https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a021782

Pignotti, M., & Thyer, B. A. (2009). Some comments on “Energy psychology: A review of the evidence”: Premature conclusions based on incomplete evidence? Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 46(2), 257–261.

Racz, J. I., Bialocerkowski, A., Calteaux, I., Rees, C. S., & Ruane, L. E. (2024). Determinants of exposure therapy implementation in clinical practice for the treatment of anxiety, OCD, and PTSD: A systematic review. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 27, 317–341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-024-00478-3

Rocha, D. N., Carvalho, E. D., Relvas, J. B., Oliveira, M. J., & Pêgo, A. P. (2022). Mechanotransduction: Exploring new therapeutic avenues in central nervous system pathology. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 16, 861613. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2022.861613

Schiller, D., Monfils, M.-H., Raio, C. M., Johnson, D. C., LeDoux, J. E., & Phelps, E. A. (2010). Preventing the return of fear in humans using reconsolidation update mechanisms. Nature, 463, 49–53. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08637

Seidi, P., Jaff, D., Connolly, S. M., & Hoffart, A. (2021). Applying Cognitive Behavioral Therapy and Thought Field Therapy in Kurdistan region of Iraq: A retrospective case series study of mental-health interventions in a setting of political instability and armed conflicts. Explore, 17(1), 84–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.explore.2020.06.003

Sherin, J. E., & Nemeroff, C. B. (2011). Post-traumatic stress disorder: The neurobiological impact of psychological trauma. Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience, 13(3),263–278. https://doi.org/10.31887/DCNS.2011.13.2/jsherin

Shin, L. M., & Liberzon, I. (2010). The neurocircuitry of fear, stress, and anxiety disorders. Neuropsychopharmacology, 35(1), 169–191. https://doi.org/10.1038/npp.2009.83

Shou, H., Yang, Z., Satterthwaite, T. D., Cook, P. A., Bruce, S. E., Shinohara, R. T., Rosenberg, B., & Sheline, Y. I. (2017). Cognitive behavioral therapy increases amygdala connectivity with the cognitive control network in both MDD and PTSD. NeuroImage: Clinical, 14, 464–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2017.01.030

Stapleton, P., Bannatyne, A. J., Urzi, K.-C., Porter, B., & Sheldon, T. (2016). Food for thought: A randomized con- trolled trial of Emotional Freedom Techniques and cognitive behavioral therapy in the treatment of food cravings. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 8(2), 232–257. https://doi.org/10.1111/aphw.12070

Stapleton, P., Buchan, C., Mitchell, I., McGrath, J., Gorton, P., & Carter, B. (2019). An initial investigation of neural changes in overweight adults with food cravings after Emotional Freedom Techniques. OBM Integrative and Com- plementary Medicine, 4(1), 14. https://doi.org/10.21926/obm.icm.1901010

Stapleton, P., Crighton, G., Sabot, D., & O’Neill, H. M. (2020). Reexamining the effect of emotional freedom techniques on stress biochemistry: A randomized controlled trial. Psychological Trauma, 12, 869–877. https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0000563

Stapleton, P., Kip, K., Church, D., Toussaint, L., Footman, J., Ballantyne, P., & O’Keefe, T. (2023). Emotional freedom techniques for treating post traumatic stress disorder: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1195286.

Stapleton, P., Oliver, B., O’Keefe, T., & Bhuta, S. (2022). Neural changes after Emotional Freedom Techniques treat- ment for chronic pain sufferers. Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice, 49, 101653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ctcp.2022.101653

Stecco, C., Frigo, G., Porzionato, A., Macchi, V., Benetazzo, L., & De Caro, R. (2011). The electrical resistance of the deep fasciae of the human body. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 2011, Article 260510.

Wang, F., Cui, G. W., Kuai, L., Xu, J. M., Zhang, T. T., Cheng, H. J., Dong, H. S., & Dong, G. R. (2017). Role of acupoint area collagen fibers in anti-inflammation of acu- puncture lifting and thrusting manipulation. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 2017(1), 2813437. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/2813437

Wittfoth, D., Pfeiffer, A., Bohne, M., Lanfermann, H., & Wittfoth, M. (2020). Emotion regulation through bifocal processing of fear inducing and disgust inducing stimuli. BMC Neuroscience, 21(47). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12868- 020-00597-x

Yao, W., Yang, H., Yin, N., & Ding, G. (2014). Mast cell-nerve cell interaction at acupoint: Modeling mechanotransduction pathway induced by acupuncture. International Journal of Biological Sciences, 10(5), 511–519. https://doi.org/10.7150/ijbs.8631

Yount, G., Church, D., Rachlin, K., Blickheuser, K., & Cardonna, I. (2019). Do noncoding RNAs mediate the efficacy of energy psychology?. Global Advances in Health and Medicine, 8, 2164956119832500. https://doi. org/10.1177/2164956119832500

Disclosure

The author has provided trainings and written extensively on the topic of this paper.